Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations

Journal Article

Title: Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations

Author:

Hevia-Koch, P.; Ladenburg, J.

Publication Date:

July 1, 2019

Journal:

Energy Research & Social Science

Volume:

Pages:

23-33

Publisher:

Elsevier

Affiliation

Danish Energy Agency

Technology:

Wind Energy

Receptor:

Human Dimensions, Visual Impacts

Document Access

Website:

External Link

Citation

Hevia-Koch, P.; Ladenburg, J. (2019). Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.010

@article{Hevia-Koch-2019-1111,
author = {Hevia-Koch, P and Ladenburg, J},
title = {Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations},
journal = {Energy Research & Social Science},
year = {2019},
month = {jul},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {53},
pages = {23--33},
doi = {10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.010},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618306662},
keywords = {Wind Energy, Human Dimensions, Visual Impacts},
}

Export Citation to BibTex

TY - JOUR
TI - Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations
AU - Hevia-Koch, P
AU - Ladenburg, J
T2 - Energy Research & Social Science
AB - One of the main drivers for acceptance of wind turbines by the public is their level of visual impacts. While recent studies have focused on estimating the welfare loss of visual impacts from wind turbines, a large share of the studies has used no or very simple visualisations of the visual impacts at stake. These studies thus rely on the cognitive skills of the respondents to imagine wind turbines of different sizes and at different locations. Based on a theoretical argument, we propose a framework for classifying different visualisation types and utilise it to review recent Stated Preferences (SP) wind power studies. The review is subsequently used to discuss the use of visualisations of wind turbines in the SP studies, highlighting the frequent choice of not using visualisations, as well as the need to raise the bar when designing scenario descriptions for valuation of the visual impacts of wind turbines.
DA - 2019/07//
PY - 2019
PB - Elsevier
VL - 53
SP - 23
EP - 33
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618306662
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.010
LA - English
KW - Wind Energy
KW - Human Dimensions
KW - Visual Impacts
ER -

Export Citation to RIS

Abstract

One of the main drivers for acceptance of wind turbines by the public is their level of visual impacts. While recent studies have focused on estimating the welfare loss of visual impacts from wind turbines, a large share of the studies has used no or very simple visualisations of the visual impacts at stake. These studies thus rely on the cognitive skills of the respondents to imagine wind turbines of different sizes and at different locations. Based on a theoretical argument, we propose a framework for classifying different visualisation types and utilise it to review recent Stated Preferences (SP) wind power studies. The review is subsequently used to discuss the use of visualisations of wind turbines in the SP studies, highlighting the frequent choice of not using visualisations, as well as the need to raise the bar when designing scenario descriptions for valuation of the visual impacts of wind turbines.